[from emol, 12 July 2011]
Santiago de Chile es la séptima ciudad más cara de América Latina
En el índice de costo de Vida de Mercer 2011 la capital chilena ascendió del lugar 123 al 75
SANTIAGO.- Santiago de Chile es la séptima ciudad más cara de América Latina, según el índice de costo de Vida de Mercer 2011 dado a conocer este martes.
El sondeo – que abarca 214 ciudades en cinco continentes y mide los costos comparativos de más de 200 rubros en cada ciudad, incluyendo vivienda, transporte, alimento, ropa, artículos para el hogar y entretenimiento- destacó las posición de la capital chilena, que ascendió del lugar 123 al 75; y la ciudad de Caracas, que subió 49 posiciones, al ocupar el sitio 51 del 100, por la alta tasa de inflación de bienes y servicios.
En América Latina coloca a Sao Paulo y Río de Janeiro en los lugares 10 y 12, respectivamente, como las ciudades más caras de la región.
Read the rest of the article here.
Click here for the complete list.
Ranking de ciudades de América Latina 2011
010.- Sao Paulo - Brasil
012.- Río de Janeiro - Brasil
033.- Brasilia - Brasil
051.- Caracas - Venezuela
053.- La Habana - Cuba
063.- Bogotá - Colombia
075.- Santiago - Chile
127.- Montevideo - Uruguay
138.- Lima - Perú
146.- San Juan - Puerto Rico
148.- Ciudad de México - México
159.- Buenos Aires - Argentina
165.- San José - Costa Rica
168.- Ciudad de Guatemala - Guatemala
183.- Monterrey -México
196.- Quito -Ecuador
199.- San Salvador - El Salvador
204.- Asunción - Paraguay
208.- Tegucigalpa - Honduras
212.- La Paz - Bolivia
213.- Managua - Nicaragua
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Thursday, July 7, 2011
happy sad in South America
[from Adelina Bash @ The Santiago Times, 4 July 2011]
Chile among South America’s least happy nations, study finds
Though Chile has one of South America’s strongest economies, a recent study of happiness rates it second-to-last in the region, leading experts to assert that national happiness is not determined by a nation’s wealth or economic development.
The survey as conducted in Chile, Perú, Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela.
Happiness in Chile was on par with happiness in the sample’s poorest country: Bolivia.
“Money does not determine happiness,” Pablo González Vicente, president of Cimagroup — the marketing analysis firm that conducted the study — said to El Mercurio. “What is more important is the level of inequality in countries: in general, the countries with the most equal distribution of wealth are happier than those with a lot of inequality.”
While there was little correlation between wealth and happiness, the study did determine other factors that appeared to influence national satisfaction.
People who live in warmer climates, for example, tend to be happier than those in colder ones, the study found. Within Chile, the cities in the warmer north were on average happier than those in the south, where the weather is much colder.
Overall, the analysis found that people were most satisfied with their family life and least satisfied with their financial situation.
Financial satisfaction, however, seemed to be determined not by the amount of money a person had, but instead by their expectations of what that money should mean.
For example, Venezuela, which the study determined was the happiest country overall, had a 56 percent economic satisfaction rate. Chileans, on the other hand, were wealthier but had a lower average satisfaction rate of about 33 percent.
Along with climate, family and finances, researchers found that happiness was influenced by a person satisfaction with his or her love life, health, job and physical appearance.
The importance of these factors varied between countries. For Chileans, personal finances were the most important; for Bolivians job satisfaction ranked the highest; and for Colombians and Peruvians love and relationships had the biggest impact.
“Even though we share the same language and may have similar histories, we are not the same,” González said of the results. There is no one indicator of happiness, he said. Instead, it seems, “every country has its own way of looking at life.”
Chile among South America’s least happy nations, study finds
Though Chile has one of South America’s strongest economies, a recent study of happiness rates it second-to-last in the region, leading experts to assert that national happiness is not determined by a nation’s wealth or economic development.
The survey as conducted in Chile, Perú, Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela.
Happiness in Chile was on par with happiness in the sample’s poorest country: Bolivia.
“Money does not determine happiness,” Pablo González Vicente, president of Cimagroup — the marketing analysis firm that conducted the study — said to El Mercurio. “What is more important is the level of inequality in countries: in general, the countries with the most equal distribution of wealth are happier than those with a lot of inequality.”
While there was little correlation between wealth and happiness, the study did determine other factors that appeared to influence national satisfaction.
People who live in warmer climates, for example, tend to be happier than those in colder ones, the study found. Within Chile, the cities in the warmer north were on average happier than those in the south, where the weather is much colder.
Overall, the analysis found that people were most satisfied with their family life and least satisfied with their financial situation.
Financial satisfaction, however, seemed to be determined not by the amount of money a person had, but instead by their expectations of what that money should mean.
For example, Venezuela, which the study determined was the happiest country overall, had a 56 percent economic satisfaction rate. Chileans, on the other hand, were wealthier but had a lower average satisfaction rate of about 33 percent.
Along with climate, family and finances, researchers found that happiness was influenced by a person satisfaction with his or her love life, health, job and physical appearance.
The importance of these factors varied between countries. For Chileans, personal finances were the most important; for Bolivians job satisfaction ranked the highest; and for Colombians and Peruvians love and relationships had the biggest impact.
“Even though we share the same language and may have similar histories, we are not the same,” González said of the results. There is no one indicator of happiness, he said. Instead, it seems, “every country has its own way of looking at life.”
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
wildlife reserve for the Patagonian huemul
[from MercoPress, 3 July 2011]
Biosphere reserve in Chilean Patagonia gives hope for preservation of the huemul
The United Nations added 18 new sites to its global list of biosphere reserves, (including one in Chilean Patagonia) bringing the total to 581 in 114 different countries, the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) reported.
The International Coordinating Council of UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB), meeting in Dresden, added sites in Lithuania, Maldives, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Togo for the first time to the World Network of Biosphere Reserves (WNBR).
Biosphere reserves are places recognized by MAB where local communities are actively involved in governance and management, research, education, training and monitoring at the service of both socio-economic development and biodiversity conservation. They are thus sites for experimenting with and learning about sustainable development, UNESCO said.
Including Chile’s Corredor Biologico de Nevados de Chillan y la Lagua del Laja in the WNBR gives a boost to private and government efforts for the conservation of the huemul, a Patagonia native deer.
The huemul herd in the Corredor Bilogico is down to 40 and highly fragmented as to their distribution which makes reproduction difficult. Besides they are geographically isolated from a greater herd further south in the Aysen region.
Chile’s National Committee for the defence of fauna and flora, CODEFF, received with great enthusiasm the UNESCO news.
“This acknowledgement has been possible because of the joint work of civil society organizations with officials from municipal, regional and central government offices”, said Bernardo Zentilli, president of CODEFF.
“The WNBR is protected by international law which is a great step forward for the conservation of the huemul, an emblematic Chilean species, which is in serious danger of extinction with only 2.500 left according to the latest census”, said Zentilli.
A biologic corridor is described as a geographic space which provides connectivity for ecosystems, habitats, original or modified and which at the same time ensures the maintenance of biological diversity, plus protection to ecologic and evolution processes.
Nevados de Chillán is an Andes cordilleran protected area with the purpose of making compatible its sustainable use with conservation of hydrologic basins, flora and fauna resources, preservation of scenic beauties, avoid the destruction of soils and protect the fields where the huemul lives.
Biosphere reserve in Chilean Patagonia gives hope for preservation of the huemul
The United Nations added 18 new sites to its global list of biosphere reserves, (including one in Chilean Patagonia) bringing the total to 581 in 114 different countries, the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) reported.
Patagonian huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) |
The International Coordinating Council of UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB), meeting in Dresden, added sites in Lithuania, Maldives, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and Togo for the first time to the World Network of Biosphere Reserves (WNBR).
Biosphere reserves are places recognized by MAB where local communities are actively involved in governance and management, research, education, training and monitoring at the service of both socio-economic development and biodiversity conservation. They are thus sites for experimenting with and learning about sustainable development, UNESCO said.
Including Chile’s Corredor Biologico de Nevados de Chillan y la Lagua del Laja in the WNBR gives a boost to private and government efforts for the conservation of the huemul, a Patagonia native deer.
The huemul herd in the Corredor Bilogico is down to 40 and highly fragmented as to their distribution which makes reproduction difficult. Besides they are geographically isolated from a greater herd further south in the Aysen region.
Chile’s National Committee for the defence of fauna and flora, CODEFF, received with great enthusiasm the UNESCO news.
“This acknowledgement has been possible because of the joint work of civil society organizations with officials from municipal, regional and central government offices”, said Bernardo Zentilli, president of CODEFF.
“The WNBR is protected by international law which is a great step forward for the conservation of the huemul, an emblematic Chilean species, which is in serious danger of extinction with only 2.500 left according to the latest census”, said Zentilli.
A biologic corridor is described as a geographic space which provides connectivity for ecosystems, habitats, original or modified and which at the same time ensures the maintenance of biological diversity, plus protection to ecologic and evolution processes.
Nevados de Chillán is an Andes cordilleran protected area with the purpose of making compatible its sustainable use with conservation of hydrologic basins, flora and fauna resources, preservation of scenic beauties, avoid the destruction of soils and protect the fields where the huemul lives.
Nevados de Chillán |
Monday, June 20, 2011
South American soy
[from Louise Gray @ The Telegraph, 20 June 2011]
GM soy: the high cost of the quest for 'green gold'
Scientists and villagers in rural Paraguay are questioning the health and environmental impact of GM soy.
The green shack where Petrona Villasboa lives in Itapuã is surrounded by shimmering fields. It represents a lucrative golden harvest for some but, for this grieving mother, it has become a symbol of death. The crop that dominates this impoverished area of rural southern Paraguay is genetically modified (GM) soy, and she blames it for her son's death. "Soy destroys people's lives," Petrona says. "It is a poison. It is no way to live."
Sitting outside her home, the mother of eight describes the day in January 2003 when 11-year-old Silvino Talavera arrived home. He had cycled to the stalls by the nearest main road to buy some meat and rice for a family meal.
"I was washing clothes down by the river, and he came to tell me that as he'd ridden along the community road, which runs through the soy fields, he'd been sprayed by one of the 'mosquitoes'," she says. ('Mosquitoes' are what locals call the pesticide or herbicide crop-spraying machines pulled by tractors.) "He smelt so bad that he took his clothes off and jumped straight in the water."
Petrona did not think much more about it. For peasant communities living amid the soy fields, chemical spraying is a frequent occurrence. But later that day, she says the whole family fell ill after eating the food that Silvino had bought.
"Silvino was violently sick. He said, 'Mummy, my bones ache' and then his skin went black'," she says.
By the time they had begged a lift to the nearest hospital. Silvino was unable to move. His stomach was pumped, but he had lost consciousness. Petrona was told her son was ''paralysed by intoxication''. All doctors could do was to offer pain relief. Within a few hours he was dead.
His family were in no doubt that his death was caused by his exposure to the crop spray, but no autopsy was carried out. It was only after years of campaigning that Petrona managed to have the case heard in court. In 2006, two farmers were each sentenced to two years in jail for manslaughter. According to Petrona, the men, who are her neighbours, have never served their sentence, and she continues to fight for justice.
Click here to read more.
GM soy: the high cost of the quest for 'green gold'
Scientists and villagers in rural Paraguay are questioning the health and environmental impact of GM soy.
![]() |
soy beans |
The green shack where Petrona Villasboa lives in Itapuã is surrounded by shimmering fields. It represents a lucrative golden harvest for some but, for this grieving mother, it has become a symbol of death. The crop that dominates this impoverished area of rural southern Paraguay is genetically modified (GM) soy, and she blames it for her son's death. "Soy destroys people's lives," Petrona says. "It is a poison. It is no way to live."
Sitting outside her home, the mother of eight describes the day in January 2003 when 11-year-old Silvino Talavera arrived home. He had cycled to the stalls by the nearest main road to buy some meat and rice for a family meal.
"I was washing clothes down by the river, and he came to tell me that as he'd ridden along the community road, which runs through the soy fields, he'd been sprayed by one of the 'mosquitoes'," she says. ('Mosquitoes' are what locals call the pesticide or herbicide crop-spraying machines pulled by tractors.) "He smelt so bad that he took his clothes off and jumped straight in the water."
Petrona did not think much more about it. For peasant communities living amid the soy fields, chemical spraying is a frequent occurrence. But later that day, she says the whole family fell ill after eating the food that Silvino had bought.
Petrona Villasboa holds a photo of her dead son, Silvino Talavera |
"Silvino was violently sick. He said, 'Mummy, my bones ache' and then his skin went black'," she says.
By the time they had begged a lift to the nearest hospital. Silvino was unable to move. His stomach was pumped, but he had lost consciousness. Petrona was told her son was ''paralysed by intoxication''. All doctors could do was to offer pain relief. Within a few hours he was dead.
His family were in no doubt that his death was caused by his exposure to the crop spray, but no autopsy was carried out. It was only after years of campaigning that Petrona managed to have the case heard in court. In 2006, two farmers were each sentenced to two years in jail for manslaughter. According to Petrona, the men, who are her neighbours, have never served their sentence, and she continues to fight for justice.
Click here to read more.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
water
We have wondered for some time about the characteristics of the water at La Estancia. We knew from Bob Cupp, La Estancia's golf course designer, that the water's pH is neutral, perfect for the course. But we didn't know about mineral content. Today we learned that La Estancia water comes from deep wells & contains no salts. What good news for all of us.
Friday, June 3, 2011
no smoking
[from MercoPress, 2 June 2011]
Argentina bans smoking in public places; forbids advertising of tobacco companies
The Argentine Lower House passed a law that bans smoking in public spaces and forbids advertising, promoting and sponsoring tobacco companies and forces manufacturers to include warnings on the back of all cigarette packs detailing the harmful effects of smoking on health.
The draft bill had the support of most political blocs and was approved by an overwhelming majority, with 182 votes in favour, one against and one abstention.
The draft bill already had the preliminary approval of the Upper House and bans the usage of marketing terms such as “light,” “soft” or others that create the false impression that a tobacco product is less harmful than another.
Deputy María Elena Chieno from the ruling coalition (Victory Front) said the bill seeks to prevent people from starting to smoke, especially since it causes 40 thousand deaths a year in Argentina, 6000 of which are passive smokers.
“The bill seeks to protect the health of the Argentines,” said Deputy Mario Fiad, who admitted that “he would have liked to intensify the citizens’ responsibility and stress on education.”
Opposition Civic Coalition lawmaker Marcela Rodríguez said the content of the law won’t dissuade people from smoking.
Argentina bans smoking in public places; forbids advertising of tobacco companies
The Argentine Lower House passed a law that bans smoking in public spaces and forbids advertising, promoting and sponsoring tobacco companies and forces manufacturers to include warnings on the back of all cigarette packs detailing the harmful effects of smoking on health.
The draft bill had the support of most political blocs and was approved by an overwhelming majority, with 182 votes in favour, one against and one abstention.
The draft bill already had the preliminary approval of the Upper House and bans the usage of marketing terms such as “light,” “soft” or others that create the false impression that a tobacco product is less harmful than another.
Deputy María Elena Chieno from the ruling coalition (Victory Front) said the bill seeks to prevent people from starting to smoke, especially since it causes 40 thousand deaths a year in Argentina, 6000 of which are passive smokers.
“The bill seeks to protect the health of the Argentines,” said Deputy Mario Fiad, who admitted that “he would have liked to intensify the citizens’ responsibility and stress on education.”
Opposition Civic Coalition lawmaker Marcela Rodríguez said the content of the law won’t dissuade people from smoking.
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Salta's trash & contamination risks
[from El Tribuno, 24 April 2011]
Basura y contaminación: crecieron los riesgos ambientales en la ciudad
Salta's population has grown 13% in the past 9 years. The average salteño consumes 650 liters of water/day & generates 1.09 kilos of trash/day.
Se consume más del triple de agua de lo esperado y hay sectores que dudan sobre la capacidad de las cloacas (doubts about sewer capacity). Cada habitante genera más de un kilo de residuos por día. Pese al volumen de desechos, casi no se recicla (almost no recycling).
Salta capital parece seguir funcionando como si los problemas ecológicos no existieran. Cada habitante supera en más de tres veces el consumo razonable de agua y genera al menos un kilo diario de basura del que no se reciclará casi nada. Además, el parque automotor no deja de crecer mientras los especialistas piden fomentar transportes menos contaminantes y se escuchan interrogantes sobre la capacidad de las cloacas.
Un salteño gasta un promedio de 650 litros de agua por día, cuando el límite debería rondar los 180 litros diarios, según informó la empresa encargada de prestar el servicio.
La conducta con el agua preocupa. “Se desarrollan permanentes campañas de concientización para que se haga un uso racional de este recurso escaso y no renovable”, señaló la responsable de comunicación de Aguas del Norte, Laura Terán.
Una comparación entre nueve ciudades representativas de la Argentina muestra que Salta es la que más litros demanda por persona después de Catamarca.
La basura es otro indicador que impone dudas sobre la sustentabilidad de la capital tal como se desarrolla hoy. Los residuos que se producen podrían seguir afectando al ambiente dentro de varias generaciones.
Un ciudadano arroja al tacho cerca de 1,09 kilos por día. En 1999, cada 24 horas llegaban unas 407 toneladas de bolsas al vertedero donde se depositan los desperdicios. Hoy, son más de 620 toneladas por jornada.
Unos 140 recuperadores tienen permitido buscar lo que se puede reciclar en el basural pero la cantidad que se llevan no llega al 3 por ciento de lo reutilizable.
El volumen de desechos preocupa en la mayoría de las ciudades porque podría terminarse el espacio para enterrarlos en el futuro. No cualquier lugar es apto para dejarlos sin que impacten en el suelo, el agua subterránea o el aire de poblaciones cercanas.
Evitar la contingencia
Hay sectores de la sociedad que vienen pidiendo una mayor proyección para manejar el crecimiento urbano. “No existe la planificación. En el centro se están haciendo muchos edificios que las normas no permiten. La zona no está preparada para tantas viviendas”, aseguró Elena Jiménez, presidenta de la ONG Red Sol.
Jiménez advirtió que las construcciones de los últimos años en el corazón de la ciudad “podrían hacer colapsar la red cloacal y repercutir en la contaminación del río Arenales”.
Además, la tradicional imagen que algunos tenían de Salta como una ciudad “con mucho verde” empieza a relativizarse con el crecimiento de la población y la incorporación de barrios nuevos.
La Organización Mundial de la Salud sostiene que debe haber más de 10 metros cuadrados cubiertos con vegetación por habitante y en Salta hay unos 5 metros cuadrados por persona, de acuerdo a datos de la Municipalidad.
La falta de pulmones se combina con una cantidad creciente de autos que consumen combustibles no renovables y generan gases contaminantes: ya hay más de 150.000 vehículos en Salta.
En la Capital viven 535.303 personas. En 9 años creció un 13 por ciento la población. La cifra habla de una urbanización en la que garantizar agua, cloacas y calidad de aire para todos, ya debería ser uno de los principales temas de la agenda pública.
Basura y contaminación: crecieron los riesgos ambientales en la ciudad
Salta's population has grown 13% in the past 9 years. The average salteño consumes 650 liters of water/day & generates 1.09 kilos of trash/day.
Se consume más del triple de agua de lo esperado y hay sectores que dudan sobre la capacidad de las cloacas (doubts about sewer capacity). Cada habitante genera más de un kilo de residuos por día. Pese al volumen de desechos, casi no se recicla (almost no recycling).
![]() |
620 tons of trash/day are delivered to el basural San Javier |
Salta capital parece seguir funcionando como si los problemas ecológicos no existieran. Cada habitante supera en más de tres veces el consumo razonable de agua y genera al menos un kilo diario de basura del que no se reciclará casi nada. Además, el parque automotor no deja de crecer mientras los especialistas piden fomentar transportes menos contaminantes y se escuchan interrogantes sobre la capacidad de las cloacas.
Un salteño gasta un promedio de 650 litros de agua por día, cuando el límite debería rondar los 180 litros diarios, según informó la empresa encargada de prestar el servicio.
La conducta con el agua preocupa. “Se desarrollan permanentes campañas de concientización para que se haga un uso racional de este recurso escaso y no renovable”, señaló la responsable de comunicación de Aguas del Norte, Laura Terán.
Una comparación entre nueve ciudades representativas de la Argentina muestra que Salta es la que más litros demanda por persona después de Catamarca.
La basura es otro indicador que impone dudas sobre la sustentabilidad de la capital tal como se desarrolla hoy. Los residuos que se producen podrían seguir afectando al ambiente dentro de varias generaciones.
Un ciudadano arroja al tacho cerca de 1,09 kilos por día. En 1999, cada 24 horas llegaban unas 407 toneladas de bolsas al vertedero donde se depositan los desperdicios. Hoy, son más de 620 toneladas por jornada.
Unos 140 recuperadores tienen permitido buscar lo que se puede reciclar en el basural pero la cantidad que se llevan no llega al 3 por ciento de lo reutilizable.
El volumen de desechos preocupa en la mayoría de las ciudades porque podría terminarse el espacio para enterrarlos en el futuro. No cualquier lugar es apto para dejarlos sin que impacten en el suelo, el agua subterránea o el aire de poblaciones cercanas.
Evitar la contingencia
Hay sectores de la sociedad que vienen pidiendo una mayor proyección para manejar el crecimiento urbano. “No existe la planificación. En el centro se están haciendo muchos edificios que las normas no permiten. La zona no está preparada para tantas viviendas”, aseguró Elena Jiménez, presidenta de la ONG Red Sol.
Jiménez advirtió que las construcciones de los últimos años en el corazón de la ciudad “podrían hacer colapsar la red cloacal y repercutir en la contaminación del río Arenales”.
Además, la tradicional imagen que algunos tenían de Salta como una ciudad “con mucho verde” empieza a relativizarse con el crecimiento de la población y la incorporación de barrios nuevos.
La Organización Mundial de la Salud sostiene que debe haber más de 10 metros cuadrados cubiertos con vegetación por habitante y en Salta hay unos 5 metros cuadrados por persona, de acuerdo a datos de la Municipalidad.
La falta de pulmones se combina con una cantidad creciente de autos que consumen combustibles no renovables y generan gases contaminantes: ya hay más de 150.000 vehículos en Salta.
En la Capital viven 535.303 personas. En 9 años creció un 13 por ciento la población. La cifra habla de una urbanización en la que garantizar agua, cloacas y calidad de aire para todos, ya debería ser uno de los principales temas de la agenda pública.
Monday, April 18, 2011
Pachamama gets respect
[from John Vidal @ guardian.co.uk, 10 April 2011]
Bolivia enshrines natural world's rights with equal status for Mother Earth
Law of Mother Earth expected to prompt radical new conservation and social measures in South American nation
Bolivia is set to pass the world's first laws granting all nature equal rights to humans. The Law of Mother Earth, now agreed by politicians and grassroots social groups, redefines the country's rich mineral deposits as "blessings" and is expected to lead to radical new conservation and social measures to reduce pollution and control industry.
The country, which has been pilloried by the US and Britain in the UN climate talks for demanding steep carbon emission cuts, will establish 11 new rights for nature. They include: the right to life and to exist; the right to continue vital cycles and processes free from human alteration; the right to pure water and clean air; the right to balance; the right not to be polluted; and the right to not have cellular structure modified or genetically altered.
Controversially, it will also enshrine the right of nature "to not be affected by mega-infrastructure and development projects that affect the balance of ecosystems and the local inhabitant communities".
"It makes world history. Earth is the mother of all", said Vice-President Alvaro García Linera. "It establishes a new relationship between man and nature, the harmony of which must be preserved as a guarantee of its regeneration."
The law, which is part of a complete restructuring of the Bolivian legal system following a change of constitution in 2009, has been heavily influenced by a resurgent indigenous Andean spiritual world view which places the environment and the earth deity known as the Pachamama at the centre of all life. Humans are considered equal to all other entities.
But the abstract new laws are not expected to stop industry in its tracks. While it is not clear yet what actual protection the new rights will give in court to bugs, insects and ecosystems, the government is expected to establish a ministry of mother earth and to appoint an ombudsman. It is also committed to giving communities new legal powers to monitor and control polluting industries.
Bolivia has long suffered from serious environmental problems from the mining of tin, silver, gold and other raw materials. "Existing laws are not strong enough," said Undarico Pinto, leader of the 3.5m-strong Confederación Sindical Única de Trabajadores Campesinos de Bolivia, the biggest social movement, who helped draft the law. "It will make industry more transparent. It will allow people to regulate industry at national, regional and local levels."
Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca said Bolivia's traditional indigenous respect for the Pachamama was vital to prevent climate change. "Our grandparents taught us that we belong to a big family of plants and animals. We believe that everything in the planet forms part of a big family. We indigenous people can contribute to solving the energy, climate, food and financial crises with our values," he said.
Little opposition is expected to the law being passed because President Evo Morales's ruling party, the Movement Towards Socialism, enjoys a comfortable majority in both houses of parliament.
However, the government must tread a fine line between increased regulation of companies and giving way to the powerful social movements who have pressed for the law. Bolivia earns $500m (£305m) a year from mining companies which provides nearly one third of the country's foreign currency.
In the indigenous philosophy, the Pachamama is a living being.
The draft of the new law states: "She is sacred, fertile and the source of life that feeds and cares for all living beings in her womb. She is in permanent balance, harmony and communication with the cosmos. She is comprised of all ecosystems and living beings, and their self-organisation."
Ecuador, which also has powerful indigenous groups, has changed its constitution to give nature "the right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structure, functions and its processes in evolution". However, the abstract rights have not led to new laws or stopped oil companies from destroying some of the most biologically rich areas of the Amazon.
Coping with climate change
Bolivia is struggling to cope with rising temperatures, melting glaciers and more extreme weather events including more frequent floods, droughts, frosts and mudslides.
Research by glaciologist Edson Ramirez of San Andres University in the capital city, La Paz, suggests temperatures have been rising steadily for 60 years and started to accelerate in 1979. They are now on course to rise a further 3.5-4C over the next 100 years. This would turn much of Bolivia into a desert.
Most glaciers below 5,000m are expected to disappear completely within 20 years, leaving Bolivia with a much smaller ice cap. Scientists say this will lead to a crisis in farming and water shortages in cities such as La Paz and El Alto.
Evo Morales, Latin America's first indigenous president, has become an outspoken critic in the UN of industrialised countries which are not prepared to hold temperatures to a 1C rise.
Bolivia enshrines natural world's rights with equal status for Mother Earth
Mamore River [photo from Wired] |
Law of Mother Earth expected to prompt radical new conservation and social measures in South American nation
Bolivia is set to pass the world's first laws granting all nature equal rights to humans. The Law of Mother Earth, now agreed by politicians and grassroots social groups, redefines the country's rich mineral deposits as "blessings" and is expected to lead to radical new conservation and social measures to reduce pollution and control industry.
The country, which has been pilloried by the US and Britain in the UN climate talks for demanding steep carbon emission cuts, will establish 11 new rights for nature. They include: the right to life and to exist; the right to continue vital cycles and processes free from human alteration; the right to pure water and clean air; the right to balance; the right not to be polluted; and the right to not have cellular structure modified or genetically altered.
Controversially, it will also enshrine the right of nature "to not be affected by mega-infrastructure and development projects that affect the balance of ecosystems and the local inhabitant communities".
"It makes world history. Earth is the mother of all", said Vice-President Alvaro García Linera. "It establishes a new relationship between man and nature, the harmony of which must be preserved as a guarantee of its regeneration."
The law, which is part of a complete restructuring of the Bolivian legal system following a change of constitution in 2009, has been heavily influenced by a resurgent indigenous Andean spiritual world view which places the environment and the earth deity known as the Pachamama at the centre of all life. Humans are considered equal to all other entities.
Pachamama |
But the abstract new laws are not expected to stop industry in its tracks. While it is not clear yet what actual protection the new rights will give in court to bugs, insects and ecosystems, the government is expected to establish a ministry of mother earth and to appoint an ombudsman. It is also committed to giving communities new legal powers to monitor and control polluting industries.
Bolivia has long suffered from serious environmental problems from the mining of tin, silver, gold and other raw materials. "Existing laws are not strong enough," said Undarico Pinto, leader of the 3.5m-strong Confederación Sindical Única de Trabajadores Campesinos de Bolivia, the biggest social movement, who helped draft the law. "It will make industry more transparent. It will allow people to regulate industry at national, regional and local levels."
Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca said Bolivia's traditional indigenous respect for the Pachamama was vital to prevent climate change. "Our grandparents taught us that we belong to a big family of plants and animals. We believe that everything in the planet forms part of a big family. We indigenous people can contribute to solving the energy, climate, food and financial crises with our values," he said.
Little opposition is expected to the law being passed because President Evo Morales's ruling party, the Movement Towards Socialism, enjoys a comfortable majority in both houses of parliament.
However, the government must tread a fine line between increased regulation of companies and giving way to the powerful social movements who have pressed for the law. Bolivia earns $500m (£305m) a year from mining companies which provides nearly one third of the country's foreign currency.
In the indigenous philosophy, the Pachamama is a living being.
The draft of the new law states: "She is sacred, fertile and the source of life that feeds and cares for all living beings in her womb. She is in permanent balance, harmony and communication with the cosmos. She is comprised of all ecosystems and living beings, and their self-organisation."
Ecuador, which also has powerful indigenous groups, has changed its constitution to give nature "the right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structure, functions and its processes in evolution". However, the abstract rights have not led to new laws or stopped oil companies from destroying some of the most biologically rich areas of the Amazon.
Coping with climate change
Bolivia is struggling to cope with rising temperatures, melting glaciers and more extreme weather events including more frequent floods, droughts, frosts and mudslides.
Research by glaciologist Edson Ramirez of San Andres University in the capital city, La Paz, suggests temperatures have been rising steadily for 60 years and started to accelerate in 1979. They are now on course to rise a further 3.5-4C over the next 100 years. This would turn much of Bolivia into a desert.
![]() |
glaciologist Edson Ramirez [photo by Dado Galdieri] |
Most glaciers below 5,000m are expected to disappear completely within 20 years, leaving Bolivia with a much smaller ice cap. Scientists say this will lead to a crisis in farming and water shortages in cities such as La Paz and El Alto.
Evo Morales, Latin America's first indigenous president, has become an outspoken critic in the UN of industrialised countries which are not prepared to hold temperatures to a 1C rise.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)